Sunday, July 2, 2017

Migration a 'biblical exodus', says Italian MP


"Charity rescue ships saving migrants in the Mediterranean were only worsening the situation:  says Romano"

Business Standard

27 June 2017


Rome, June 27 (IANS/AKI) Italy is on the receiving end of a "biblical exodus" of boat migrants from Africa, an Italian lawmaker said on Tuesday, urging the government to halt the influx, even by refusing migrants entry at national ports.

"We are now facing an biblical exodus," said Paolo Romani, head of ex-Premier Silvio Berlusconi's opposition Forza Italia party in the upper house of Parliament.

"A total of 5,000 migrants were saved (in the Mediterranean) yesterday while 8,500 are currently heading for Italy aboard rescue ships," said Romani.

Italy's centre-left government was showing a "worrying" inability to manage a situation that was "becoming more dramatic each day", he said.

"The government has the obligation to shoulder all of its responsibilities and to act in the national interest, if necessary, by blocking our ports, as other countries have done," Romano stated.

He accused the Italian government of accepting "empty promises" of help from European Union leaders in sharing the migrant burden and said the UN Security Council should help stop the migrant boats set sail from North Africa.

"Either we take immediate action or we face an evident failure that will have inevitable political consequences, Romano warned.

Charity rescue ships saving migrants in the Mediterranean were only "worsening the situation," Romano alleged.

The government has struggled to handle over half a million migrants including refugees and asylum-seekers who have landed in Italy since 2014.

--IANS/AKI

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/migration-a-biblical-exodus-says-italian-mp-117062701057_1.html

Last Drop: Danes Want to Penalize Migrant-Smuggling NGOs



27.06.17


Denmark's ruling Liberal Party wants to penalize NGOs rescuing migrants and refugees trying to cross the Mediterranean by boat. While the Liberals' stance has been backed by fellow government parties and the EU border agency itself, it also triggered criticism from human rights organizations.

The Liberal Party wants to strip Danish aid funds from NGOs involuntarily contributing to the smuggling of people into Europe by saving migrants trying to cross the Mediterranean by boat.

Liberal immigration spokesman Marcus Knuth stressed the fact that the government follows the line set by the EU border agency Frontex, which also slammed NGOs for funding or taking part in rescue missions.

"I strongly agree with the criticism. Aid organizations create a greater incentive to undertake the dangerous journey across the Mediterranean Sea, and I look upon that gravely," Marcus Knuth told the Danish newspaper Berlingske. "So we should look at where these organizations get their funds from, and if it comes from Denmark, we should strongly reconsider continued support," he continued.

The criticism was supported by the Danish People's Party, as well as the Conservative Party.

At present, nine NGOs operate ships in the Mediterranean off the coast of Libya, which is the most popular route for migrants from Africa, the Middle East and Asia trying to reach Europe. Last year alone, 181,000 ventured upon the perilous crossing, with a record 5,000 drowning en route. This year, another 72,000 refugees and migrants arrived in Italy by sea, an increase of almost 28 percent compared with the same period last year. The NGOs claim to have saved about a third of them, yet were unable to prevent about 2,000 deaths.

According to Berlingske, just one of the nine NGOs operating in the Mediterranean receives Danish government aid, namely Red Barnet (Save the Children), headed by former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt.

Needless to say, Red Barnet was not enthusiastic by the Liberals' criticism, maintaining it was misplaced.

"There is no connection between our efforts and human trafficking. A number of studies have proved that," Jonas Keiding Lindholm of Red Barnet told Berlingske.

The Danish criticism was also condemned by the deputy directory of Human Rights Watch, Judith Sunderland.

"The logic of those who criticize rescue operations as a pull factor is that these groups should stop saving people and let them drown to deter others from coming," Judith Sunderland said, as quoted by the Danish newspaper Information.

Meanwhile, Swedish national broadcaster SVT's foreign commentator Erika Bjerström suggested that young men from non-warring democracies lacking refugee status travel to Europe, which they see as a cash machine.

"Migrant streams are coming from West Africa. They are almost just men hailing from countries such as Senegal, Nigeria, Côte d'Ivoire and Gambia. These are democracies with good economic growth. They have heard about Europe as a paradise and are seeking happiness and a better life," Erika Bjerström told SVT. "The big problem is that these young men are misinformed, as they are seeing Europe as a single cash machine," she continued, adding that 90 percent are economic migrants in search of a better life.

In related news, Finnish officials have recently intervened to prevent an aide to Labor Minister Jari Lindström from cutting funding to NGOs assisting immigrant children, including two Somali grassroots organizations. While the decision was reversed as "lacking rationale," the aide claimed to have followed orders instead of "flying solo."

Source: https://sputniknews.com/europe/201706271055003954-denmark-migrant-smuggling/


* "Government party wants to punish NGOs for saving refugees crossing the Mediterranean": http://cphpost.dk/news/government-party-wants-to-punish-ngos-for-saving-refugees-crossing-the-mediterranean.html
* "Venstre vil straffe NGOer, når de redder flygtninge i Middelhavet": https://www.b.dk/globalt/venstre-vil-straffe-ngoer-naar-de-redder-flygtninge-i-middelhavet?referrer=RSS


German Court Investigating Pro-Migrant NGO for People Smuggling


26.06.17


Dresden/Germany - The spokesman of the prosecutor's office in Dresden Lorenz Haase confirmed today that a criminal complaint was filed against NGO "Mission Lifeline" accusing them of attempted smuggling of illegal aliens into the country. If proven guilty, the accused may face a sentence of up to 5 years imprisonment (German Penal Code § 96 AufenthG "Einschleusen von Ausländern").

Both the chairman of the "Mission Lifeline" Axel Steier and his deputy Sascha Pietsch have been summoned to appear before the investigators.

The investigation is currently being conducted by the German Federal Police.

Similar investigations have been already launched by three different State Prosecutors and are ongoing in Italy.

The country with the most "sea rescuers" operating in the central Mediterranean is Germany with five organizations and six vessels - one costing ca. 420,000 Euro (ca. 450,000 USD) per month to keep at sea - over 4 800 000 million Euro a year (ca. 5 100 000 million USD).

Source:

* "Sea rescuers under investigation"/"Ermittlungen gegen Seenotretter":  https://www.sz-online.de/nachrichten/ermittlungen-gegen-seenotretter-3713318.html

Leaders at EU summit to reinforce Libyan coast guard

 

EUobserver

By Nikolaj Nielsen

22. June 2017



(BRUSSELS) EU leaders will broadly avoid discussing refugee quotas at this week's summit due to internal disagreement but instead focus on stopping people coming to Europe.

The EU summit talks are part of a desperate plan to curtail the flow of migrants and refugees from Africa, as the EU imposes greater emphasis on security and border controls throughout the region.

EU council president Donald Tusk, in a letter addressed to EU leaders on Wednesday (21 June), said more must be done to keep people from disembarking from Libya's 1,900 km coastline.

"I don't see why we cannot bear greater financial responsibility for the functioning of the Libyan navy coastguards," he said.

Tusk, who described the Libyan coastguard as allies in the fight against smugglers, noted that far more people are leaving the war-torn country to Italy compared to last year.

The issue will become a focal point of discussions among EU leaders on Friday afternoon in Brussels.

Senior diplomats have told reporters that the meeting on Friday will likely zone in on the external dimension of migration, where there is wider consensus.

Other more politically charged internal issues on migration, like imposing mandatory asylum quotas, are likely to get short shrift given the surrounding sensitivities among anti-asylum EU states.

"The focus on the whole migration issue will rather be on that side, the external one," noted one EU diplomat.

UN report on Libyan coast guard

A report earlier this month by the United Nations has also cast a long shadow over efforts to reinforce the Libyan coast guard.

A panel of experts at the UN body accused the coast guard of being directly involved in violating the human rights of migrants.

Those who are returned to the country are often placed into detention centres, some are held for ransom, while others are auctioned off in slave markets.

This year alone, the EU has trained 133 members of the Libyan coastguard, with many more awaiting training. The guard has plucked an estimated 23,000 people from Libya's territorial waters since 2016.

The scramble to prevent people from leaving includes wider proposals on border management in the Sahel region and along Libya's vast porous southern desert borders with Algeria, Chad and Niger.

Among the proposals is a joint Italy-German border management plan to secure the 400 km border with Niger.

Another involves the Swiss-based International Organisation for Migration (IOM), which is trying to stabilise the area by working with the different tribal groups. Italy is also carrying out a similar project.

While far fewer people are using the route in Niger to reach Libya, others are treading more dangerous paths.

In a statement, some 18 civil society organisations, including Save the Children, Amnesty International and Oxfam, have described the EU's external migration plans as broadly ineffective.

Rather than open up more legal routes to allow people to reach Europe, the EU is trying to impose barriers, they say.

"In spite of deterrence measures put in place, people continue to move in search of safety or a better life," noted the statement.

Libya and southern borders

The EU has earmarked around €90 million for Libya. The funding is supposed to improve conditions in the detention centres and help fund projects coordinated by a number of UN agencies as well as the German Development Agency.

But the tasks in Libya are wrought with difficulties given that the country still has no functioning state and is overrun by some 1,500 different armed militia groups.

Most people who end up in the country did so to seek work and not to leave for Europe, while others may have no option but to disembark.

Among them are Bangladeshis, who now count as among the largest nationality leaving Libya to reach Italy.

"A year ago, Bangladeshis were not coming through the Central Mediterranean route at all," noted one EU official.

Up until the end of April this year, around 4,600 Bangladeshis left Libya for Europe, behind 5,200 from Nigeria, and close to 6,000 from Guinea.


Source: https://euobserver.com/migration/138302

Related Stories: EU Leans on Libyan Military to Stop Migrants: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/eu-seeks-to-stop-migration-across-the-mediterranean-a-1152976.html

Efforts to Rescue Migrants Caused Deadly, Unexpected Consequences


The New York Times

By STUART A. THOMPSON and ANJALI SINGHVI

14 June 2017



Strategies to rescue migrants in the Mediterranean Sea and disrupt smuggling networks have had deadly, unexpected consequences, according to aid groups monitoring the crisis.

It is part of a wrenching Catch-22: Any effort to lessen the migrant crisis can backfire as smuggling networks devise even more dangerous strategies in response. Here is how those strategies have pushed desperate migrants into even more desperate situations.

Smugglers Respond to Rescue Efforts


The bodies of 10 migrants were recovered and at least 100 more migrants were missing on Saturday off the coast of Libya. Eight of the bodies were found on an inflatable boat in the Mediterranean Sea, in a treacherous area between Libya and Italy known as the Central Mediterranean route. Each year, aid groups patrol the area and rescue thousands of migrants at risk of drowning.

* "Before 2014, rescues took place closer to Italy, with migrant boats traveling as far as Italian waters. By 2014, many rescues were occurring farther south in the Mediterranean."

* "By 2015, rescues reached even closer to the Libyan side of the Mediterranean Sea."

* "More recently, rescues were taking place closer to Libyan territorial waters."



Rescuing migrants closer to the Libyan coast saved hundreds of people at sea. But critics said it introduced a deadly incentive for more migrants to risk the journey and for smugglers to launch more boats.

“Migrants and refugees – encouraged by the stories of those who had successfully made it in the past – attempt the dangerous crossing since they are aware of and rely on humanitarian assistance to reach the E.U.,” said a risk analysis by Frontex, the European Union border and coast guard agency.

Smugglers use flimsy boats and provide just enough fuel to reach the edge of Libyan waters. Drivers can remove the engine and head back to Libya on another boat, leaving the migrants adrift until help arrives.

Groups monitoring the crisis expect the death toll to surpass last year’s figures. And it has done so for every month this year, until recently: A series of drownings over three days killed 700 people in May 2016.

Joel Millman, a spokesman for the International Organization for Migration, cautioned against concluding that the situation had improved.

“It’s much more piecemeal,” he said, referring to the slower but steadier pace of drownings. “It’s much more dangerous. They’re putting people in much smaller boats and in greater numbers.”

While dire conditions in Libya and other African countries have played a larger role in motivating migrants to flee, aid groups have recognized how their efforts have bolstered the smuggling business model.

“We know that what we do is not the solution,” said Stefano Argenziano, operation coordinator on migration for Doctors Without Borders, which has rescued migrants near the Libyan coast since 2015. “It’s not the source of the problem, it’s not the solution to the problem. It’s the sheer necessity of saving lives now, when lives are in danger.”

Despite the criticism, there is no evidence that reducing rescue efforts would reduce fatalities. After the European Union stopped funding the Italian patrol and rescue program Mare Nostrum in 2014, a record number of people attempted the journey, and a record number of people drowned. The United Nations also supported increasing rescue efforts, saying the death toll would be higher without them.

Smugglers Downgrade as Boats Are Destroyed

Officials started destroying wooden boats used by smugglers, hoping this would disrupt the criminal networks. But this had an unintended effect: Smugglers increasingly used cheaper rubber dinghies.

The European Council started sinking boats in 2015 and has destroyed more than 400 boats since then.

“The onset of anti-smuggling operations has accelerated the pace of the degradation” in quality and safety, Mr. Argenziano said.

The cheaper 30-foot dinghies are blamed for increasing the number of deaths at sea because they are unfit for long travel and prone to punctures and capsizing, according to the United Nations Refugee Agency.

Roughly the size of two sedans, the vessels were designed to carry about 60 passengers. But Frontex has seen more than 150 people on any given craft. Those numbers have increased since 2015, according to Europol.

“If you have a dinghy with 170 people on board, these boats can capsize in seconds,” said Izabella Cooper, a spokeswoman for Frontex. “And it really takes seconds for people to drown. Many people who are coming from Africa have never seen the sea in their lives before.”

All sides agree the solution ultimately lies in Libya and deeper within Africa, where improving conditions and opportunities could prevent people from boarding boats and making the deadly journey.

Governments have considered strategies that could discourage migrants from boarding boats at all, like an Italian agreement to train the Libyan Coast Guard so it can intercept and rescue migrants before they reach international waters.

“There’s no doubt that the situation in Libya is bad enough for thousands and thousands of foreigners and migrants” to flee, said Federico Soda, the director of the Coordination Office for the Mediterranean with the International Organization for Migration.

“It’s really time to start looking at some of the long-term policies,” he added. “Africa and Europe are always going to be neighbors. Movement of people between the two is just a reality of the coming decade.”



Source: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/14/world/europe/migrant-rescue-efforts-deadly.html?_r=1

NGO Anti-smuggling Efforts End Up Fueling Human Smuggling


NPQ

By Erin Rubin

15 June 2017


NGOs operating in the Mediterranean Sea are venturing closer and closer to the Libyan shore in hopes of reaching refugees before they drown. Unfortunately, both migrants and smugglers have taken advantage of this impulse, worsening the overall situation for those at sea.

The migrant crisis in the Mediterranean, like the civil war in Syria, often drops out of the western world’s public consciousness when it doesn’t affect everyday life. Nevertheless, hundreds of thousands of people continue to flee war, famine, and persecution in African countries. In 2016, a record number of 181,459 people tried to cross into Europe from northern Africa. Eighty-nine percent of these traveled through Libya, and over 5,000 of them drowned.

Frontex, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, reports:

During 2015, and the first months of 2016, smuggling groups instructed migrants to make satellite phone calls to the Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre (MRCC) in Rome to initiate targeted rescues on the high seas…Since June 2016, a significant number of boats were intercepted or rescued by NGO vessels without any prior distress call and without official information as to the rescue location. NGO presence and activities close to, and occasionally within, the 12-mile Libyan territorial waters nearly doubled compared with the previous year.

 

Both smugglers and migrants are aware that NGO presence on the sea is increasing and have taken advantage of the situation by sending more people in flimsier boats out to sea. According to the New York Times, “Smugglers use flimsy boats and provide just enough fuel to reach the edge of Libyan waters. Drivers can remove the engine and head back to Libya on another boat, leaving the migrants adrift until help arrives.”

Migrant death rates have continued to increase, despite increased rescue efforts, because of increased motivation to just get out on the water and the increasing unfitness of smugglers’ boats for the number of people on board. Stefano Argenziano, operation coordinator on migration for Doctors Without Borders, said, “The onset of anti-smuggling operations has accelerated the pace of the degradation.” A spokeswoman for Frontex, Izabella Cooper, pointed out that many people coming from non-coastal areas do not know how to swim.

Italy, where most of the refugees from North Africa end up, has a complicated relationship with its former colony. Libya has known less than a century of self-rule in its entire history. It has been ruled by the Spanish, Ottomans, and other governments from the time the Romans conquered it in 74 B.C. until the United Nations oversaw a transition to independence in 1951. As the last colonial rulers, the Italians built roads and trains but not a national identity that would permit Libya’s various territorial groups to work together. In fact, like most colonial powers, they deliberately encouraged internal divisions, which has led to dire conditions from which Libyans attempt to flee.

Italy and Libya have worked on this problem before. In 2008, in exchange for a promise of $5 billion over 25 years from Italy to address Libya’s economic conditions, Libya closed its coast to migrants. It worked, in a way; the migrant flow stopped. However, since Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi was overthrown in 2011, Libya has struggled to support a stable unified government that can build international partnerships and manage large humanitarian crises. As Doctors Without Borders pointed out, “Libya is not a party to the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees” and there was widespread abuse of would-be immigrants.

Italy and Libya have entered into a new partnership, whereby the Italians train the Libyan coastguard to rescue the migrants and bring them back to Libya. However, since the government is still in formative stages, the deal has already run into legal issues. Opponents are concerned about the plan to put migrants in camps, exposing them to risk of abuse. In addition,

[Lawyers] disputed the ability of [Prime Minister Fayez al] Serraj to make such a deal on behalf of the Government of National Accord (GNA). This is because according to the Libyan Political Agreement, until it is approved by the House of Representatives, the GNA along with the State Council, has no legal standing.

While Libya and Italy work out their legal responsibilities and local NGOs search ever widening areas of the Mediterranean, hundreds of thousands of people are in transition, hoping to end up in a better life. Even if the migrants make it to Italy, there is no guarantee that they’ll be resettled in in the West. The U.S. accepts a paltry number of migrants, and other European countries, like Hungary, are closing their borders. As Rick Cohen noted in NPQ in 2015, the moral outrage that the West showed over Darfur and Somalia is notably absent for the migrant crisis; might it have something to do with people coming in, rather than aid going out? In Rick’s poignant words, “In anesthetizing public opinion, many world leaders have made us all crewmembers guiding the ‘damned’ to oblivion.”

Source: https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2017/06/15/ngo-anti-smuggling-efforts-end-fueling-human-smuggling/

Police should be allowed aboard migrant NGO ships-Prosecutor

Balance between saving lives and catching traffickers says Roberti

ANSAmed

1 June 2017


ROME - Italian police should be allowed on board NGO ships rescuing migrants in the Mediterranean, National Anti-Mafia and Anti-Terror Prosecutor Franco Roberti told the parliamentary Schengen committee Wednesday. Without hindering rescues, he said, a police officer "could do typical police work: we need a balance between saving threatened lives and ascertaining the responsibilities of traffickers". Italian prosecutors have said they have heard of NGOs having links to traffickers but they said they had no evidence of this.

Roberti said: "now the dinghies leave Libyan coasts (and the Libyans have never set the limit of their territorial waters, 12 or 16 miles) and they immediately find the NGOs ships that offload them.

"The problem is that the humanitarian ships carry out a function filling in for government ships.

"Objectively, beyond possible connivance with traffickers, they do a much-needed job. "The point is supplying the NGOs with our code of conduct under the UN, they should agree to comply with the guidelines which we have published".


Source: http://www.ansamed.info/ansamed/en/news/sections/politics/2017/05/31/police-should-be-allowed-aboard-migrant-ngo-ships-prosecutor_6bc75aea-9f87-47ff-9552-c22b74e3e7dd.html


NGOs in direct contact with human traffickers using social media - Details on migrant boats departure coordinated via WhatsApp & Facebook.

The UN High Commissioner for Refugees confirms: "We are looking for useful information on social media to monitor the departures" (sic!)


Source:

* "The NGOs are in contact with traffickers on Facebook". Here is the dossier with evidence. - "Le Ong sono in contatto con i trafficanti su Facebook". Ecco il dossier con le prove.: http://notizie.tiscali.it/cronaca/articoli/ong-contatto-trafficanti-su-facebook/
* "[Exclusive] The boss of traffickers friends with NGO man. The video that demonstrates collaboration with traffickers" - [Esclusiva] Il boss degli scafisti amico dell'uomo Ong. E il video che dimostra la collaborazione con i trafficanti: http://notizie.tiscali.it/esteri/articoli/boss-scafisti-amico-uomo-ong/
* "Here is the evidence in three photos - NGOs replace the traffickers" - Ecco le prove in tre foto: le ​Ong rimpiazzano gli scafisti: http://www.ilgiornale.it/news/politica/ecco-prove-tre-foto-ong-rimpiazzano-scafisti-1391308.html
*  Catania Chief Prosecutor Zuccaro "We have evidence of contacts between traffickers and some rescuers" - "There are recorded phone calls of people who organize the departures and NGO groups funded by questionable sources, but the politic must intervene." -
* “Abbiamo le prove dei contatti tra scafisti e alcuni soccorritori” Il procuratore di Catania: “Ci sono telefonate con chi organizza gli sbarchi e gruppi finanziati da personaggi discutibili. Ma deve intervenire la politica”: http://www.lastampa.it/2017/04/23/italia/cronache/abbiamo-le-prove-dei-contatti-tra-scafisti-e-alcuni-soccorritori-3fCnqLKWWRHBVUiygHv65K/pagina.html